Intentionally, I also wanted that this blog be a platform for me to put my two cents on relevant issues.
Because we all have our unique and possibly useful points of view, we maintain blogs, tweet our thoughts, Facebook post opinionated memes, [insert other freedom-of-expression actions done in the Web]. When the law takes effect on the 3rd of October, what will happen to us Social Media madlang people and to the good ol' Philippines which, as per NGO Freedom House, Freedom On The Net 2012 'FREE' status ranked 7th among the participating countries in the world and 1st in Asia? Could become only 'Partly Free'.
While the Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012 serves a warning to those no-good Web lurkers, there are certain provisions that should be amended, if not declared null and void, such as the scary thing that presents to punish FB likes and Twitter RT's and even your old bashing/bullying/attacking-someone posts, among others being petitioned to the high court. (Be warned, check your archives, stat!)
In defence of the blogtroversial statute, it challenges us to become responsible, to *SHADDAP* when we have nothing constructive to say. And yet, as I see it, it's flawed still, very broad and has negative impacts.
Here's one urging the SC and the concerned lawmakers and netizens to create the necessary solutions. Amend RA 10175 ASAP.
Bottom line: we are still entitled to express ourselves, but more carefully now.
(Disclaimer: This is not, I assume, in any way, libelous.)
Because we all have our unique and possibly useful points of view, we maintain blogs, tweet our thoughts, Facebook post opinionated memes, [insert other freedom-of-expression actions done in the Web]. When the law takes effect on the 3rd of October, what will happen to us Social Media madlang people and to the good ol' Philippines which, as per NGO Freedom House, Freedom On The Net 2012 'FREE' status ranked 7th among the participating countries in the world and 1st in Asia? Could become only 'Partly Free'.
Here's the anti-cybercrime law and this is crazy
While the Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012 serves a warning to those no-good Web lurkers, there are certain provisions that should be amended, if not declared null and void, such as the scary thing that presents to punish FB likes and Twitter RT's and even your old bashing/bullying/attacking-someone posts, among others being petitioned to the high court. (Be warned, check your archives, stat!)
In defence of the blogtroversial statute, it challenges us to become responsible, to *SHADDAP* when we have nothing constructive to say. And yet, as I see it, it's flawed still, very broad and has negative impacts.
Here's one urging the SC and the concerned lawmakers and netizens to create the necessary solutions. Amend RA 10175 ASAP.
Bottom line: we are still entitled to express ourselves, but more carefully now.
(Disclaimer: This is not, I assume, in any way, libelous.)